BMI and Endometrial Cancer Risk: Insights Into Potential Links
<ѻý class="dek">—Findings suggest that early interventions targeting potential causes might reduce risk for endometrial cancer in obese women.ѻý>Interventions that might reduce risk for endometrial cancer in obese women are suggested by findings from a study that identifies the potential mechanisms linking body mass index (BMI) to endometrial cancer risk.1
By applying Mendelian randomization to 14 possible molecular risk factors for endometrial cancer, a team from the United Kingdom uncovered “strong evidence” that fasting insulin, bioavailable testosterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) mediated the effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk.
ѻý asked lead author Emma Hazelwood, PhD candidate, why her team decided to apply Mendelian randomization to investigate these potential molecular risk factors.
“Although the association between obesity and endometrial cancer is well established, we don’t have a clear explanation for this link. Many of the proposed ideas are based on observational data, which can be biased by confounding and reverse causation,” replied Ms. Hazelwood, a researcher at the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom.
She explained that Mendelian randomization can identify causal effects with less bias because: “This genetic epidemiology technique uses germline genetic variants as proxies for risk factors, with the advantage being that these are randomly assorted across a population and fixed at conception, so this approach should suffer less from these biases.”
Molecular mechanisms analyzed
The investigators’ analytic strategy began with attempts to corroborate evidence of BMI’s effect on endometrial cancer risk from previous Mendelian randomization studies. They then performed literature reviews to identify molecular traits previously suggested to link BMI to endometrial cancer.
To proxy each molecular trait, the team used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously associated with each risk factor in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) from 12,906 patients with endometrial cancer and 108,979 controls.
“We then used Mendelian randomization to find which of these traits had evidence for a causal effect on endometrial cancer risk, and which of those traits BMI had a causal effect on,” Ms. Hazelwood commented.
The final step: The investigators did a mediation analysis to determine how much each trait (the proportion) mediated the total effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk.
Reasons BMI increases endometrial cancer risk revealed
Systematic Mendelian randomization analysis corroborated the link between elevated BMI and increased risk for endometrial cancer and provided evidence that fasting insulin, total and bioavailable testosterone, and SHBG also increased this. risk.
- BMI: odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) (4.7 kg/m2) increase in BMI 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69 to 2.09, P=3.87 × 10−31
- Total testosterone: OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 1.64, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.88, P=1.71 × 10−12
- Bioavailable testosterone: OR per natural log transformed nmol/L increase: 1.46, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.65, P=3.48 × 10−9
- Fasting insulin: OR per natural log transformed pmol/L increase: 3.93, 95% CI 2.29 to 6.74, P=7.18 × 10−7
- SHBG: OR per inverse-normal transformed nmol/L increase 0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85, P=2.07 × 10−4
Evidence regarding the degree to which these factors mediated the effect of BMI on risk for endometrial cancer was revealed by mediation analysis.
- Fasting insulin: mediated 19% of total effect (95% CI 5 to 34%, P=9.17 × 10−3)
- Bioavailable testosterone: mediated 15% (95% CI 10 to 20%, P=1.43 × 10−8)
- SHBG: mediated 7% (95% CI 1 to 12%, P = 1.81 × 10−2)
Interestingly, the investigators found “little evidence” that several previously reported molecular risk factors had a causal effect on endometrial cancer risk. These included LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, leptin, adiponectin, Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
Commenting on her team’s findings, Ms. Hazelwood said:
“Our findings demonstrate that insulin levels may explain a large proportion of the effect of BMI on endometrial cancer risk, as well as confirming that sex hormone-binding globulin and testosterone also play an important role. This is consistent with the ‘unopposed oestrogen’ hypothesis for endometrial cancer development, although insulin may cause endometrial cancer development through additional, independent pathways.”
What are the potential clinical implications?
We posed this question to Andrea R. Hagemann, MD, MSCI, an independent expert not involved in the study. “We've known that medicines like metformin can help modify the endometrium, but the effect has been smaller than we've hoped. Perhaps we've used it too late—once diagnosis has already been established. With more targeted understanding, we can start a medication like metformin earlier.”
“Most exciting,” added Dr. Hagemann, member, “If we can improve insulin resistance with anti-diabetic medications, this may set the stage for use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, which are now FDA approved for the treatment of obesity. We could test the effect of these agents on the endometrium and circulating metabolic markers.” Dr. Hagemann is Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and a practicing gynecologic oncologist at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.
Ms. Hazelwood also sees promise in the potential use of anti-diabetic agents prescribed for obesity to reduce risk for endometrial cancer. “Further studies are needed to determine whether these agents actually do decrease risk for development of endometrial cancer,” said Ms. Hazelwood. But she added, “I would recommend that clinicians be aware that this analysis sits within a wider body of evidence suggesting that insulin levels may play an important role in explaining the link between obesity and endometrial cancer risk.”
Ms. Hazelwood also pointed out that, “Clinical trials looking at combining contraceptive intrauterine devices with metformin as a treatment option for early stage endometrial cancer patients with obesity are currently underway.”
What about findings regarding testosterone and SHBG?
“Agents targeting bioavailable testosterone and SHBG may also be effective in reducing endometrial cancer risk in individuals with obesity,” replied Ms. Hazelwood. She added, however, “It is anticipated that these agents may have more unwanted off-target effects than those targeting insulin due to the wide variety of roles of these sex hormones.”
Published:
References